| Procrastination Destination |
|
||
profileKhai Rul ![]() Create Your Badge | |||
Tuesday, April 21, 2015Pareto improvement.
Do people really have to suffer up to a certain extent before they learn a valuable lesson? Are we really incapable of reaching a point in our lives where we are able to automatically comprehend the potential lessons that would surface and bring us enlightenment, should a particular event occur. I am convinced critical thinking would possibly make suffering obsolete in some instances. If we could just, actually think carefully, and make use of the abundance of bad historical decisions that exist around us, to our advantage. And don't give me that "not everyone can do that" bullshit. You're right. And wrong. Everyone can, albeit eventually, do that. I've seen it, and I am impressed by the few who had taken full advantage of their ability to gradually attain this thought process.
I'm still pretty much adamant on the idea that there really is a more effective way to grasp life's lessons without having to go through a bad patch yourself. There're so many people living around you. What a waste it would be, if you prefer not to free-ride and instead expend unnecessary time and energy towards undergoing something perceivably bad, yet highly preventable.
Hahahahahhahaha to be honest, after rereading that whole chunk above, I almost convinced myself I am a selfish prick, making use of another person's impoverishment to my advantage. But let's stop and think, and then reveal to ourselves where true selfishness lies. The dude hasn't got much to lose now, and you have something to gain from that, haven't you? If I may add, I believe in being an opportunist, ESPECIALLY when I am able to prevent another person from being worse off, whilst becoming better, off of him.
Wait a minute.. am I suggesting a shift towards Pareto Optimality in life..?? #kwakwa
But really.. Isn't that the end goal we should all reach out for? WE ARE DEFINITELY STILL FAR OFF THE SCALE. There're no bullshit assumptions limiting us to only two goods. Our graphs ain't pathetically 2-dimensional.. Nobody ever said the goods in our market were limited to the tangible ones.. SO LET'S TRADE BARBARICALLY WHY DONT WE?
Ok, ok. Fine..
I really want to admit that there has been an ever-increasing interest in my study of economics in school, at this point.. But I'm afraid if I do that now I would've possibly challenged myself to do well for that subject in 15 days time. Hardly anybody ever admits, in the open, that they really enjoy whatever it is they're learning in school! It's preposterous! And is taboo!
And you know what else is, apparently, taboo..? Ending a post abruptly.
|
|||
linksAaron! Amanda! Amir! Ben Goh! Benedict! Charmaine Tay! Cheryl Tan! Cheryl Seng! Debra Jane! ElissaYoung! Gwen! Janice! Jasmine Ee! Jasmine Tee! Jason! Jessica! Justine! Justin Chong! Kesaven! Khaliesah! Leon! Luqman! Mark! Marissa! Ming Hui! Ming Zhen! Naren! Natalie! Nicole! Paolo! Pei Fen! Phillip! Qiyi! Rachel! Rina! Rudy! Sara! Shimun! Tiffanie! Venice! Wanyi! Wei Fen! Wei Hao Ng! Wen Ting! Wendy! Xue Qian! Yeeling! Zhi Pang! creditsOrange Buster© Electric 2009 - Forever. All Rights Reserved.Powered by Blogger. |
|||
tagboardyour Archives | |||